EPA Finalizes Cleanup Plan for
Scientific
Chemical Processing Superfund Site in Carlstadt, New Jersey
(New
York, N.Y. – October 4, 2012) The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has
finalized its plan to clean up contaminated ground water at the Scientific
Chemical Processing Superfund site in Carlstadt, New Jersey. Past industrial
activities contaminated shallow and deep levels of the ground water with
volatile organic compounds, which can have serious health effects. The cleanup
plan calls for the ground water to be treated to break down the contaminants to
protect people’s health and the environment. The EPA held a public meeting on
August 19, 2012 to explain its plan and considered public input before
finalizing it.
Some
volatile organic compounds can cause cancer. The extent and nature of potential
health effects depend on many factors, including the level and length of
exposure to the pollution.
From
the 1940s to 1980, what is now referred to as the Scientific Chemical Processing
site was used to process solvents for further use or disposal. In 1970, the
Scientific Chemical Processing Company leased the site and used the property for
processing industrial waste from 1971 until the company was shut
down.
The
Scientific Chemical Processing site was listed on the EPA’s Superfund list of
the nation’s most hazardous waste sites in 1983. Between 1983 and 1985, the New
Jersey Department of Environmental Protection required the company to remove
approximately 250,000 gallons of waste stored in tanks that had been abandoned
at the site. The EPA took the lead in overseeing the cleanup in 1985.
Because
of the nature and complexity of the contamination at the site, the cleanup has
been conducted in three phases. The first phase began in 1990, when the EPA
implemented a plan to contain contaminated shallow ground water and soil on the
former Scientific Chemical Processing property while a longer term plan could be
developed. An underground wall was constructed to prevent the contaminated
ground water from moving off the property. A cap was installed to prevent
exposure to contaminated soil on the property and to keep rain and flood water
from seeping into the ground water. In addition, a system was built to collect
the shallow ground water so it could be shipped off-site for treatment and
disposal.
In
August 2002, based on the results of monitoring conducted after the first phase
of work, the EPA began implementing a long-term plan for the shallow ground
water and soil on the property. Under this plan, the EPA removed an area of
highly contaminated soil and upgraded the ground water extraction system. Ground
water is still being shipped off-site for treatment and disposal. This work was
completed in October 2011.
During
the third and final phase under the plan that has just been finalized,
substances designed to break down the contaminants to less toxic forms will be
injected into the deeper ground water in affected areas both on and off the
former Scientific Chemical Processing Company property. Samples of the ground
water will be collected and analyzed regularly to ensure the technology is
effective and remains protective of human health and the environment. Monitoring
will continue until ground water cleanup levels have been met.
The
Superfund program operates on the principle that polluters should pay for the
cleanups, rather than passing the costs to taxpayers. After sites are placed on
the Superfund list of the most contaminated waste sites, the EPA searches for
parties responsible for the contamination and holds them accountable for the
costs of investigations and cleanups. The cleanup of the Scientific Chemical
Processing site is being conducted and paid for by a group of over 100 companies
with oversight by the EPA.
For
more information on the Scientific Chemical Processing Superfund site, go to:
http://www.epa.gov/region02/superfund/npl/scientificchemical/
Follow
EPA Region 2 on Twitter at http://twitter.com/eparegion2
and Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/eparegion2
12-127
# # #
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.