Search This Blog

Tuesday, March 31, 2015

EPA chief: Keystone wouldn’t be a ‘disaster’ for climate | TheHill

The head of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said the Keystone XL pipeline would not be disastrous for the climate.
Gina McCarthy’s comments on Monday came despite her agency’s position that low oil prices could mean that Keystone will have more of an impact on the climate than previously thought.


EPA chief: Keystone wouldn’t be a ‘disaster’ for climate | TheHill

Monday, March 30, 2015

Elon Musk to unveil 'major new Tesla product line' - Mar. 30, 2015

Tesla is about to launch a mysterious new line of products.



The only hint CEO Elon Musk is willing to give about the new lineup: it's not a new electric car.



Elon Musk to unveil 'major new Tesla product line' - Mar. 30, 2015

Forests Get Smarter With Sensor Technology | The Network

A network of U.S. forests, linked through IoE technology, will allow researchers to study the state of ecosystems in real time.



Forests Get Smarter With Sensor Technology | The Network

The Internet of Everything Transforms Hamburg into a Smart Connected City | The Network

Explore how the Port of Hamburg leverages the Internet of Everything to connect traffic, parking, lighting, port logistics, and more.



The Internet of Everything Transforms Hamburg into a Smart Connected City | The Network

ORNL-led team demonstrates desalination with nanoporous graphene membrane

From Oak Ridge National Laboratory:


ORNL-led team demonstrates desalination with nanoporous graphene membrane

 

Researchers created nanopores in graphene (red, and enlarged in the circle to highlight its honeycomb structure) that are stabilized with silicon atoms (yellow) and showed their porous membrane could desalinate seawater. Orange represents a non-graphene residual polymer. Image credit: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Dept. of EnergyResearchers created nanopores in graphene (red, and enlarged in the circle to highlight its honeycomb structure) that are stabilized with silicon atoms (yellow) and showed their porous membrane could desalinate seawater. Orange represents a non-graphene residual polymer. Image credit: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Dept. of Energy (hi-res image)
OAK RIDGE, Tenn., March 25, 2015—Less than 1 percent of Earth’s water is drinkable. Removing salt and other minerals from our biggest available source of water—seawater—may help satisfy a growing global population thirsty for fresh water for drinking, farming, transportation, heating, cooling and industry. But desalination is an energy-intensive process, which concerns those wanting to expand its application.

Now, a team of experimentalists led by the Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge National Laboratory has demonstrated an energy-efficient desalination technology that uses a porous membrane made of strong, slim graphene—a carbon honeycomb one atom thick. The results are published in the March 23 advance online issue of Nature Nanotechnology.

“Our work is a proof of principle that demonstrates how you can desalinate saltwater using free-standing, porous graphene,” said Shannon Mark Mahurin of ORNL’s Chemical Sciences Division, who co-led the study with Ivan Vlassiouk in ORNL’s Energy and Transportation Science Division.

“It’s a huge advance,” said Vlassiouk, pointing out a wealth of water travels through the porous graphene membrane. “The flux through the current graphene membranes was at least an order of magnitude higher than [that through] state-of-the-art reverse osmosis polymeric membranes.”

Current methods for purifying water include distillation and reverse osmosis. Distillation, or heating a mixture to extract volatile components that condense, requires a significant amount of energy. Reverse osmosis, a more energy-efficient process that nonetheless requires a fair amount of energy, is the basis for the ORNL technology.

Making pores in the graphene is key. Without these holes, water cannot travel from one side of the membrane to the other. The water molecules are simply too big to fit through graphene’s fine mesh. But poke holes in the mesh that are just the right size, and water molecules can penetrate. Salt ions, in contrast, are larger than water molecules and cannot cross the membrane. The porous membrane allows osmosis, or passage of a fluid through a semipermeable membrane into a solution in which the solvent is more concentrated.

“If you have saltwater on one side of a porous membrane and freshwater on the other, an osmotic pressure tends to bring the water back to the saltwater side. But if you overcome that, and you reverse that, and you push the water from the saltwater side to the freshwater side—that’s the reverse osmosis process,” Mahurin explained.

Today reverse-osmosis filters are typically polymers. A filter is thin and resides on a support. It takes significant pressure to push water from the saltwater side to the freshwater side. “If you can make the membrane more porous and thinner, you can increase the flux through the membrane and reduce the pressure requirements, within limits,” Mahurin said. “That all serves to reduce the amount of energy that it takes to drive the process.”

Graphene to the rescue
Graphene is only one-atom thick, yet flexible and strong. Its mechanical and chemical stabilities make it promising in membranes for separations. A porous graphene membrane could be more permeable than a polymer membrane, so separated water would drive faster through the membrane under the same conditions, the scientists reasoned. “If we can use this single layer of graphene, we could then increase the flux and reduce the membrane area to accomplish that same purification process,” Mahurin said.

To make graphene for the membrane, the researchers flowed methane through a tube furnace at 1,000 degrees C over a copper foil that catalyzed its decomposition into carbon and hydrogen.  The chemical vapor deposited carbon atoms that self-assembled into adjoining hexagons to form a sheet one atom thick.

The researchers transferred the graphene membrane to a silicon nitride support with a micrometer-sized hole. Then the team exposed the graphene to an oxygen plasma that knocked carbon atoms out of the graphene’s nanoscale chicken wire lattice to create pores. The longer the graphene membrane was exposed to the plasma, the bigger the pores that formed, and the more made.

The prepared membrane separated two water solutions—salty water on one side, fresh on the other. The silicon nitride chip held the graphene membrane in place while water flowed through it from one chamber to the other. The membrane allowed rapid transport of water through the membrane and rejected nearly 100 percent of the salt ions, e.g., positively charged sodium atoms and negatively charged chloride atoms.

To figure out the best pore size for desalination, the researchers relied on the Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences (CNMS), a DOE Office of Science User Facility at ORNL. There, aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) imaging, led by Raymond Unocic, allowed for atom-resolution imaging of graphene, which the scientists used to correlate the porosity of the graphene membrane with transport properties. They determined the optimum pore size for effective desalination was 0.5 to 1 nanometers, Mahurin said.

They also found the optimal density of pores for desalination  was one pore for every 100 square nanometers. “The more pores you get, the better, up to a point until you start to degrade any mechanical stability,” Mahurin said.

Vlassiouk said making the porous graphene membranes used in the experiment is viable on an industrial scale, and other methods of production of the pores can be explored. “Various approaches have been tried, including irradiation with electrons and ions, but none of them worked. So far, the oxygen plasma approach worked the best,” he added. He worries more about gremlins that plague today’s reverse osmosis membranes—growths on membrane surfaces that clog them (called “biofouling”) and ensuring the mechanical stability of a membrane under pressure.

Mahurin, Vlassiouk and Sheng Dai, of both ORNL and the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, conceived the idea and designed the experiments. Vlassiouk prepared membranes and measured ion transport. Sumedh Surwade of ORNL performed water transport experiments and made pores in graphene. Unocic performed aberration-corrected STEM to reveal atomic structure. Gabriel Veith of ORNL revealed the detailed chemical composition with x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements and analyzed the results. Mahurin, Vlassiouk, Surwade, Dai and Sergei Smirnov of New Mexico State University analyzed the data and interpreted the results.

The title of the paper is “Water Desalination Using Nanoporous Single-Layer Graphene.”

Research was sponsored by ORNL’s Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program. A portion of the work was conducted at the CNMS, a DOE Office of Science User Facility at ORNL.

UT-Battelle manages ORNL for DOE’s Office of Science. The single largest supporter of basic research in the physical sciences in the United States, the Office of Science is working to address some of the most pressing challenges of our time.—by Dawn Levy

Sunday, March 29, 2015

EPA Funding to Temple University will help Revitalize Philadelphia’s North Kensington Area

From EPA:


EPA Funding to Temple University will help Revitalize Philadelphia’s North Kensington Area
PHILADELPHIA (March 27, 2015) Funding from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to Temple University will help plan for health, environmental and economic improvements for Philadelphia’s Kensington area residents through the cleanup and reuse of brownfield properties in a 161-acre area which is part of the North of Lehigh neighborhood. EPA awarded a $200,000 Brownfields area-wide planning grant to Temple University to develop the project.
“I’m pleased to announce that Temple is the first university to receive an EPA Brownfields area-wide planning grant,” said EPA Regional Administrator Shawn M. Garvin. “Helping build healthy and resilient communities is an EPA priority. This funding to Temple underscores the University’s environmental leadership and commitment to improving the health and future of its neighboring communities.”
With the EPA funding, Temple University’s Center for Sustainable Communities will collaborate with New Kensington Community Development Corporation (NKCDC) and leaders from community and city organizations including the Philadelphia City Planning Commission, Conrail, and SEPTA Police Department to engage the community in planning and designing future uses of brownfield properties.
“Temple University strongly believes in university-community partnerships,” said Dr. Jeffrey Featherstone, Director of the Center for Sustainable Communities. “With generous support from the Environmental Protection Agency’s Brownfields Area-Wide Planning grant program, we will work with the New Kensington Community Development Corporation on numerous community outreach and visioning exercises, including participatory photo mapping, focus groups and design workshops. We will also arrange a number of community meetings throughout the project period. Community involvement and participation is integral to this project.”
The Center will develop an area-wide plan for a key portion of Philadelphia’s Lower North Delaware Industrial District, focusing on brownfield sites adjacent to the Lehigh Viaduct, a freight rail corridor located along Lehigh Avenue, between Kensington Avenue and I-95. The primary focus will be between Kensington Avenue and Tulip Street, according to Dr. Mahbubur Meenar, Assistant Director of GIS Operations and Research for the Center for Sustainable Communities and an adjunct faculty member in Temple’s Department of Community and Regional Planning.
“The project area exemplifies the cumulative detrimental effects of a formerly industrial neighborhood -- a distressed community left behind with significant social, public health and environmental justice concerns. There are also striking public health concerns within the community, including lack of healthy food availability and accessibility to open space,” said Meenar.
Nationwide this year, EPA awarded approximately $4 million in area-wide planning grants to 20 communities in 16 states. The funds will be used to engage communities and conduct planning for Brownfields revitalization.
Strategies for site reuse often lead to increased opportunities to leverage public and private investment and strengthen local economies. Since 1995, EPA has awarded 13 brownfields grants totaling $4.6 million to assess and cleanup sites and provide job training in Philadelphia.
In addition to the collaboration of local efforts, the partners and Temple will be able to benefit from of state and federal collaboration with transportation, housing, employment and economic development agencies.

Information on the grant recipients: 
http://epa.gov/brownfields/areawide_grants.htm

Information on the Partnership for Sustainable Communities: 
http://www.sustainablecommunities.gov/

Technical Assessment Team Report on Cause of Breached Drum at Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Released

From the U.S. Department of Energy:


Technical Assessment Team Report on Cause of Breached Drum at Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Released

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The U.S. Department of Energy today released a report by an independent team of technical experts that evaluated the mechanisms and chemical reactions contributing to the failure of a waste drum at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant(WIPP) in Carlsbad, N.M.
   The Technical Assessment Team (TAT) concluded that one drum, Drum 68660, was the source of radioactive contamination released during the February 14, 2014, radiological event at WIPP. The contents of Drum 68660 were chemically incompatible and the drum breached as a result of internal chemical reactions.  
   The Department charged the TAT with determining to the extent feasible the mechanisms and chemical reactions that may have resulted in the breach of at least one waste drum and release of waste material.  The TAT included scientists from several DOE national laboratories, including Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Idaho National Laboratory, and Sandia National Laboratory, and was led by Savanah River National Laboratory. Lab participants included scientific experts from across several disciplines, such as sampling and analysis, forensic science, modeling, and reaction chemistry, enabling the generation and peer review of scientifically-based conclusions.  
   Click here to read the full Technical Assessment Team report and fact sheet.

EPA acts to protect Puget Sound shellfish beds from manure runoff, fines Lynden dairy

From EPA:


EPA acts to protect Puget Sound shellfish beds from manure runoff, fines Lynden dairy

Polluted runoff that contributes to shellfish closures can be prevented with basic measures at upstream facilities

CONTACT: Hanady Kader, EPA Public Affairs, 206-553-0454, kader.hanady@epa.gov

(Seattle—March 26, 2015) The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued a compliance order and $7,500 penalty to R. Bajema Farm for violations of the Clean Water Act. During a 2013 inspection of the Lynden, Washington dairy farm, EPA staff observed the discharge of water polluted with animal waste to a ditch that flows into Fishtrap Creek and the Nooksack River, which empties into North Puget Sound near shellfish beds.

The facility has agreed to update and follow its Nutrient Management Plan and correct issues causing discharges from confinement areas. Concentrated animal feeding operations and other agricultural facilities that discharge to surface waters must have a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. R. Bajema Farm confined 350 mature dairy cows at the time of inspection and did not have a permit.

“For both industries to thrive, agriculture and shellfish farms must coexist,” said Ed Kowalski, Director of the Office of Compliance and Enforcement in the EPA Seattle office. “Many agricultural facilities in Whatcom County are already helping to protect downstream Puget Sound shellfish farms by using tools that allow them to apply manure at the right time, in the right place, in the right amount, which minimizes polluted runoff. EPA will enforce water quality laws if facilities fail to comply with basic, environmentally protective regulations.”

R. Bajema Farm also drew the attention of the Washington State Department of Agriculture, which issued a civil penalty in 2014 for a discharge of runoff from an area of land where the owner had applied manure.

Shellfish beds in North Puget Sound depend on clean water and are struggling because of fecal coliform pollution running downstream into Puget Sound. Fecal coliform originates from multiple sources including wastewater treatment plants, poorly managed septic systems, application of manure to fields, and agricultural facilities such as livestock operations, poultry farms, and dairy farms.

Water contaminated with fecal coliform drains from land into creeks and rivers, making its way into Puget Sound where the fecal coliform can contaminate shellfish. When fecal coliform levels rise, shellfish bed operators cannot harvest because the shellfish pose a risk to consumers.

The Lummi Nation has been particularly impacted by shellfish bed closures with millions of dollars in economic loss.

According to the Washington State Department of Agriculture, there are 106 dairies in Whatcom County with 44,000 mature animals and 16,000 replacement stock that generate millions of pounds of manure each year. In addition, there are agricultural operations such as feedlots, heifer replacement facilities, poultry farms and hobby farms where manure must be managed carefully.

Operators of agricultural facilities can refer to manure spreading advisories and mapping that allows them to minimize the risk of runoff by deciding when and where to spread manure based on weather, soil conditions, soil type, field slope, equipment used, and the type of field.

In addition, state and local agencies have hosted well-attended workshops on environmentally protective dairy nutrient management. The events covered rules and regulations, irrigation water management and identification and management of high-risk areas.

For more information on manure handling systems, visit  http://www.epa.gov/agriculture/ag101/dairymanure.html

If you would rather not receive future communications from Environmental Protection Agency, let us know by clickinghere.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle, WA 98101 United States

EPA Awards Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Grants to Reduce Runoff that Contributes to Algal Blooms

From EPA:


EPA Awards Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Grants to Reduce Runoff that Contributes to Algal Blooms

Contact Information: Peter Cassell, 312-886-6234, cassell.peter@epa.gov

15-OPA128

CHICAGO (March 26, 2015)  -- The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency today announced the award of 14 Great Lakes Restoration Initiative grants totaling over $17 million to fund projects that will improve Great Lakes water quality by preventing phosphorus runoff and soil erosion that contribute to algal blooms and by reducing suspended sediments in Great Lakes tributaries. 

“These Great Lakes Restoration Initiative grants will be used for critical projects to prevent soil erosion and reduce phosphorus runoff that contributes to algae growth in the Great Lakes,” said Great Lakes National Program Manager Susan Hedman. “Many of these grants target Great Lakes watersheds where there have been harmful algal blooms in recent years – such as Maumee Bay on Lake Erie, Saginaw Bay on Lake Huron and Green Bay on Lake Michigan.”

The projects funded by the GLRI grants announced today will be implemented by conservation organizations and by state and local governments:

  • Fox-Wolf Watershed Alliance Inc. ($4,196,221) will use conservation practices – such as stream buffering and cover crops – in key sections of the Lower Fox River watershed to reduce nutrient runoff and soil erosion that impacts Green Bay and Lake Michigan.

  • Ohio Environmental Protection Agency ($3,696,182) will retire 270 acres of cropland, restore six miles of streams, stabilize 1,000 feet of eroding stream banks and restore 70 acres of wetlands at eight locations in the Maumee River watershed to prevent phosphorus from entering Lake Erie.

  • The Nature Conservancy ($2,558,853) will administer a program to reimburse farmers for implementing conservation practices (tillage, cover crops and drainage water management) on 10,000 acres of cropland in the Saginaw Bay watershed. The project will reduce nutrient runoff and soil erosion that impacts Saginaw Bay and Lake Huron.

  • Green Bay Metropolitan Sewerage District Council ($1,686,669) will work with partners to implement conservation practices on over 70 percent of cropland in the Duck Creek watershed to reduce nutrient runoff and soil erosion that impacts Green Bay and Lake Michigan.

  • Western Reserve Land Conservancy ($750,000) will purchase 1,000 acres of easements in northern Ohio’s Grand River watershed -- protecting five miles of streams and 400 acres of wetland -- to reduce nutrient runoff and soil erosion that impacts Lake Erie.

  • Delta Institute ($750,000) will lead a coalition of community organizations to prevent nutrient runoff and soil erosion in the Bear Creek/Bear Lake watershed to reduce impacts on the Muskegon Lake Area of Concern and Lake Michigan. The coalition will promote the use of best practices to reduce nutrient runoff and soil erosion from farms and urban areas. 

  • The Stewardship Network ($745,000) will work with partners to provide farmers in the River Raisin watershed with technical assistance on best practices to prevent nutrient runoff and soil erosion into the river and Lake Erie.

  • Grand Traverse Bay Watershed Initiative ($729,840) will work with two major landowners to restore eroding stream banks and install green infrastructure at Kids Creek-- reducing stormwater runoff and soil erosion that impacts Grand Traverse Bay and Lake Michigan.

  • Ohio Environmental Protection Agency ($689,060) will expand agricultural conservation practices to 8,000 acres of cropland in five northern Ohio watersheds that flow into the Sandusky River. The project will reduce nutrient runoff and soil erosion into Lake Erie.

  • Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee ($580,000) will excavate, re-grade and stabilize 900 feet of stream banks along the Menomonee River, which flows through Milwaukee and discharges directly into Lake Michigan. The stream banks are composed largely of building debris which contains contaminants such as asbestos and lead. The project will reduce the discharge of contaminants and sediment into the river and Lake Michigan.

  • Muskegon River Watershed Assembly ($356,970) will work with partners to establish cover crops on 2,000 acres of agricultural land. In addition, buffers will be established on 24 acres of stream banks, and 500 feet of stream banks will be stabilized at community parks.  The project will reduce nutrient runoff and soil erosion into Tamarack Creek, the Muskegon River and Lake Michigan.

  • Superior Watershed Partnership ($330,403) will restore about 1,500 feet of eroding stream banks at a rural river (Salmon-Trout River) and an urban river (Dead River) in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. The project will reduce stormwater runoff, improving water quality in both rivers and in the near-shore waters of Lake Superior.

  • Outdoor Discovery Center ($250,000) will restore over 40 acres of wetlands and floodplain to increase floodwater storage capacity along the Macatawa River which will reduce soil erosion and the quantities of nutrients and streambed sediment entering Lake Michigan.

  • Chagrin River Watershed Partners Inc. ($178,479) will partner with the City of Wickliffe, Ohio, and Cleveland Metroparks on a project to restore 640 feet of streams and wetlands in the Deer Creek/Gully Brook watershed. The project will reduce soil erosion and the quantity of nutrients and streambed sediment entering the Chagrin River and Lake Erie.

This year, EPA has awarded GLRI grants totaling over $25 million to fund 29 projects to protect and restore the Great Lakes. Earlier this month, EPA announced 15 GLRI grants totaling over $8.1 million to fund projects to combat invasive species.   

Since 2010, EPA has funded more than 700 Great Lakes restoration and protection projects totaling over $570 million.  For more information about the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, visit www.glri.us.

EPA Report: Automakers Surpassing Light-Duty Greenhouse Gas Standards

From EPA:


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 26, 2015

EPA Report: Automakers Surpassing Light-Duty Greenhouse Gas Standards
Manufacturers competing to deliver most fuel-efficient vehicles
WASHINGTON – For the second consecutive model year, the automotive industry outperformed the national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions standards by a wide margin. Overall industry compliance in model year 2013 was 12 grams/mile – or 1.4 miles per gallon – better than required by the 2013 standard. 
These were among the top findings released today in the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) second annual Manufacturers’ Performance Report. The report presents detailed information about how individual firms are complying with GHG emissions standards for cars and light trucks. 
“These findings are a terrific early success story for President Obama’s historic effort to reduce the pollution that contributes to climate change,” said EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy. “Automakers are racing to meet our goals. The American auto industry has never been stronger, we’re creating jobs here in the U.S., selling cleaner cars here and overseas, and consumers are really benefitting from the innovations spurred by these standards.”
The report found:
  • Overall industry compliance in model year 2013 was 12 grams/mile better than required by the 2013 standard. This marks the second consecutive model year of industry outperforming the standards by a wide margin.
  • The majority of manufacturers (representing more than 99% of sales) met both the 2012 and 2013 standards. The remaining manufacturers have several more years to come into compliance.
  • Automakers are using the optional flexibilities built into the standards such as improved air conditioning systems and the use of fleet averaging. These flexibilities continue to increase consumer choice, spur technology innovation and decrease compliance costs all while providing manufacturers with options on how and when to make reductions.
According to EPA’s most recent CO2 Emissions and Fuel Economy Trends Report, model year 2013 vehicles achieved an all-time record average of 24.1 miles per gallon (mpg) – a 0.5 mpg increase over the previous year and an increase of nearly 5 mpg since 2004. Average carbon dioxide emissions from cars and light trucks are also at a record low. Fuel economy has increased in eight of the last nine years. There are more than three times as many 30 mpg vehicles than just five years ago, and fuel economy for SUVs has been increasing faster than for any other vehicle type.
EPA’s GHG emissions standards cover light-duty vehicles from model year 2012 to 2025. The standards are projected to save 12 billion barrels of oil, and cut 6 billion metric tons of greenhouse gases over the lifetimes of vehicles sold in these years. The standards are also projected to save consumers who purchase a new MY 2025 vehicle more than $8,000 in fuel costs over that vehicle’s lifetime.
More information on the Manufacturers’ Performance Report: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/climate/ghg-report.htm
More information on Light Duty Vehicle Standards: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/climate/regs-light-duty.htm
More information on greenhouse gases and Fuel Economy Trends: http://epa.gov/otaq/fetrends.htm
R068

EPA announces $925,000 for tribal clean diesel projects in Washington

From EPA:


EPA announces $925,000 for tribal clean diesel projects in Washington

Funds will support cleaner engines for marine vessels operated by Upper Skagit Tribe, Swinomish Indian Tribal Community, Lummi Nation

CONTACT: Hanady Kader, EPA Public Affairs, 206-553-0454, kader.hanady@epa.gov

(Seattle—March 24, 2015) The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is announcing over $925,000 in grant funds for tribes in Washington to remove older marine diesel engines that emit harmful air pollutants and replace them with newer engines for more efficient marine vessels. All the grant funds will go to the North Puget Sound tribal communities of the Upper Skagit Tribe, the Swinomish Indian Tribal Community, and the Lummi Nation.

“Puget Sound tribal communities depend on fishing, and this funding for cleaner marine engines results in tribal fleets that are better for the air and for the health of tribal communities,” said Dennis McLerran, Regional Administrator for EPA Region 10. “Funding through the Diesel Emission Reduction Act provides an important opportunity to leverage public and tribal funds for cleaner marine vessels.”

The grants, which are implemented with additional sources of leveraged funding, will support the following tribal projects:

Swinomish Indian Tribal Community

The Swinomish Indian Tribal Community is receiving $792,000 to reduce diesel pollution from the Swinomish Fishing Fleet. The project will replace twelve older and more polluting marine diesel engines with new, low-emission diesel engines. The project is expected to improve the air quality for the Swinomish Indian Tribal Community. The proposed project will also achieve emissions reduction from vessels using the shore power pedestals at the fisherman’s docks by allowing engines to be shut down while loading and unloading.

Lummi Nation

The Lummi Nation is receiving $77,250 to reduce diesel pollution from two marine fishing fleet vessels that are used to harvest salmon, halibut, crab, and shrimp. The Lummi Reservation is located in Whatcom County and is ranked among the 80th percentile of the worst counties in the United States for the number of people living in areas where cancer risk from HAPs (Hazardous Air Pollutants) exceeds 1 in 10,000, for which diesel emissions is a high contributing factor. The average year of diesel engines in the Lummi fishing fleet is 1992. Older engines have poor performance, low fuel-efficiency, and high emissions. Repowering marine vessels is one of the most efficient and cost-effective techniques for cleaner air and a healthier environment.

Upper Skagit Tribe

The Upper Skagit Tribe is receiving $55,890 to fund a marine engine repower project. The project will repower the Upper Skagit Indian Tribe’s Fisheries Regulatory Compliance vessel by replacing an older, more polluting engine, with a newer, more efficient marine diesel engine meeting. Waterways immediately adjacent to the Skagit/Samish watersheds experience a disproportionate amount of air pollution from diesel fleets. This project will reduce emissions from the compliance vessel, which will be used in the ports around Skagit, Island and Whatcom counties.

Older diesel engines emit significant amounts of air pollutants such as nitrogen oxides (NOX) and particulate matter (PM). These pollutants are linked to a range of serious health problems including asthma, lung and heart disease, other respiratory ailments, and even premature death. Diesel engines also emit black carbon which has been linked to climate change. New diesel and alternative fuel technology can reduce diesel pollution by more than 90 percent.

Since the start of the DERA program in 2008, EPA has awarded over 700 grants across the US in 600 communities. Many of these projects fund cleaner diesel engines that operate in economically disadvantaged communities whose residents suffer from higher-than-average instances of asthma, heart, and lung disease. The DERA program is set to expire in 2016.

For more information about the West Coast Collaborative and EPA region 9 and 10 projects, visitwww.westcoastcollaborative.org. For more information about the projects awarded nationally, visitwww.epa.gov/cleandiesel/prgnational.htm.

EPA announces $428,000 for Idaho clean diesel projects

From EPA:


EPA announces $428,000 for Idaho clean diesel projects

Funds will support advanced diesel technology on school buses, tractors and irrigation pumping plants

CONTACT: Hanady Kader, EPA Public Affairs, 206-553-0454, kader.hanady@epa.gov

(Seattle—March 24, 2015) The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is announcing over $428,000 in grant funds for Idaho to reduce harmful air pollution from diesel engines. The funds will be used replace old school buses and retrofit old school buses with advanced diesel technology, replace four tractors used in agriculture and convert irrigation pumping plants from diesel to electric power.

“These projects provide advanced diesel technology that supports community health in Idaho,” said Dennis McLerran, Regional Administrator for EPA Region 10. “Funding through the Diesel Emission Reduction Act provides an important opportunity to leverage public and private funding for cleaner trucks, buses, boats and heavy equipment.”

The Franklin Soil and Water Conservation District is receiving over $349,000 to replace four tractors and three school buses. In addition, the funds will go to convert three irrigation pumping plants from diesel to electric in the Utah-Idaho Cache Valley airshed, an area where air quality is a concern. New clean diesel technology is more than 90 percent cleaner than older, higher emitting diesel engines.

The Idaho Department of Environmental Quality is receiving nearly $79,000 to retrofit 24 school buses with idle reduction devices that reduce diesel emissions and save fuel. The school buses will operate in priority areas and airsheds with air quality problems. The project will focus on buses in the Silver Valley of Idaho, where the town of Pinehurst has been designated as non-attainment for National Ambient Air Quality Standards. School bus fleets operate largely in residential areas where children live and school facilities are located. This project will reduce the risk from toxic pollutants by reducing the exposure of school-age children to diesel emissions from school buses. 

Of the $8 million awarded nationally, EPA Regions 9 and 10 awarded $2.5 million through the West Coast Collaborative, a partnership of public and private entities in the western states. The $2.5 million will fund eight projects that include school buses, trucks and agricultural equipment that will operate cleaner thru more advanced diesel technology as well as natural gas and electric power alternatives.

Diesel engines are extremely efficient but emit air pollutants such as nitrogen oxides (NOX) and particulate matter (PM). These pollutants are linked to a range of serious health problems including asthma, lung and heart disease, other respiratory ailments, and even premature death. Diesel engines also emit black carbon which has been linked to climate change. New diesel and alternative fuel technology can reduce diesel pollution by more than 90 percent.

Since the start of the DERA program in 2008, EPA has awarded over 700 grants across the US in 600 communities. Many of these projects fund cleaner diesel engines that operate in economically disadvantaged communities whose residents suffer from higher-than-average instances of asthma, heart, and lung disease. The DERA program is set to expire in 2016.

For more information about the West Coast Collaborative and EPA region 9 and 10 projects, visitwww.westcoastcollaborative.org. For more information about the projects awarded nationally, visitwww.epa.gov/cleandiesel/prgnational.htm.

CORRECTION: EPA Proposes Reporting and Record Keeping Requirements on Nanoscale Materials in the Marketplace

From EPA:


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 25, 2015


EPA Proposes Reporting and Record Keeping Requirements on Nanoscale Materials in the Marketplace

For the first time the agency will use TSCA authority to collect health and safety information on nanoscale chemicals already in use

WASHINGTON D.C., – The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing one-time reporting and recordkeeping requirements on nanoscale chemical substances in the marketplace. 

“Nanotechnology holds great promise for improving products, from TVs and vehicles to batteries and solar panels,” said Jim Jones, EPA’s Assistant Administrator for Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention. “We want to continue to facilitate the trend toward this important technology. Today’s action will ensure that EPA also has information on nano-sized versions of chemicals that are already in the marketplace.”

EPA currently reviews new chemical substances manufactured or processed as nanomaterials prior to introduction into the marketplace to ensure that they are safe. For the first time, the agency is proposing to use TSCA to collect existing exposure and health and safety information on chemicals currently in the marketplace when manufactured or processed as nanoscale materials.  The proposal will require one-time reporting from companies that manufacture or process chemical substances as nanoscale materials. 

The companies will notify EPA of:

•certain information, including specific chemical identity; 
•production volume; 
•methods of manufacture; processing, use, exposure, and release information; and, 
•available health and safety data. 

Nanoscale materials have special properties related to their small size such as greater strength and lighter weight, however, they may take on different properties than their conventionally-sized counterpart. The proposal is not intended to conclude that nanoscale materials will cause harm to human health or the environment; Rather, EPA would use the information gathered to determine if any further action under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), including additional information collection, is needed.

The proposed reporting requirements are being issued under the authority of section 8(a) under TSCA. The agency is requesting public comment on the proposed reporting and recordkeeping requirements 90 days from publication in the Federal Register. EPA also anticipates holding a public meeting during the comment period. The time and place of the meeting will be announced on EPA’s web page at: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/nano/


Additional information and a fact sheet on the specifics of the proposed rule and what constitutes a nanoscale chemical material can be found at: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/nano/

R68

EPA Proposes Reporting and Record Keeping Requirements on Nanoscale Materials in the Marketplace

From EPA:


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 25, 2015


EPA Proposes Reporting and Record Keeping Requirements on Nanoscale Materials in the Marketplace

For the first time the agency will use TSCA authority to collect health and safety information on nanoscale chemicals already in use

WASHINGTON D.C., – The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing one-time reporting and recordkeeping requirements on nanoscale chemical substances in the marketplace. 

“Nanotechnology holds great promise for improving products, from TVs and vehicles to batteries and solar panels, said Jim Jones, EPA’s Assistant Administrator for Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention. “We want to continue to facilitate the trend toward this important technology. Today’s action will ensure that EPA also has information on nano-sized versions of chemicals that are already in the marketplace.”

EPA currently reviews new chemical substances manufactured or processed as nanomaterials prior to introduction into the marketplace to ensure that they are safe. For the first time, the agency is proposing to use TSCA to collect existing exposure and health and safety information on chemicals currently in the marketplace when manufactured or processed as nanoscale materials.  The proposal will require one-time reporting from companies that manufacture or process chemical substances as nanoscale materials. 

The companies will notify EPA of:

•    certain information, including specific chemical identity; 
•    production volume; 
•    methods of manufacture; processing, use, exposure, and release information; and, 
•    available health and safety data. 

Nanoscale materials have special properties related to their small size such as greater strength and lighter weight, however, they may take on different properties than their conventionally-sized counterpart. The proposal is not intended to conclude that nanoscale materials will cause harm to human health or the environment; Rather, EPA would use the information gathered to determine if any further action under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), including additional information collection, is needed.

The proposed reporting requirements are being issued under the authority of section 8(a) under TSCA. The agency is requesting public comment on the proposed reporting and recordkeeping requirements 90 days from publication in the Federal Register. EPA also anticipates holding a public meeting during the comment period. The time and place of the meeting will be announced on EPA’s web page at (add link)

Additional information and a fact sheet on the specifics of the proposed rule and what constitutes a nanocale chemical material can be found at: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/nano/

R68