Search This Blog

Wednesday, February 4, 2015

U.S. EPA, Air District Unveil Air Monitor at Busiest US-Mexico Border Crossing

From EPA:


For Immediate Release: February 3, 2015
Media Contacts:
U.S. EPA: Nahal Mogharabi, 213-244-1815Mogharabi.nahal@epa.gov
San Diego APCD: Michael Drake, 858-495-5736Michael.Drake@sdcounty.ca.gov  
 
U.S. EPA, Air District Unveil Air Monitor at Busiest US-Mexico Border Crossing
Monitor will help understand pollution at San Ysidro Port of Entry
LOS ANGELES— Today, U.S. EPA, along with the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District (SDAPCD) will unveil a new air pollution monitor at the San Ysidro port of entry, located on the US-Mexico border about 16 miles from downtown San Diego. 50,000 cars and buses and 25,000 pedestrians cross there daily, making it the busiest land port of entry in the Western Hemisphere.
The monitor measures PM 2.5 (fine particulate matter up to 2.5 microns in diameter), which can result in negative health effects when inhaled. The device, which begins operating today, will be used to collect real time data on the levels of air pollutants in San Ysidro and adjoining communities. EPA is providing $110,000 to the SDAPCD for the two year project that includes the purchase, installation, and operation of the monitor.  At the conclusion of the study, if PM 2.5 levels are elevated, the District and EPA will identify its sources and work to reduce it where possible. 
“Air pollution knows no boundaries,” said Jared Blumenfeld, EPA’s Regional Administrator for the Pacific Southwest. “The goal is to protect our communities near the border through a better understanding of the soot that may be affecting San Ysidro, whether from tailpipe emissions or wood smoke.”  
In collaboration with the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) and the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the monitor has been placed on the roof of the pedestrian building at the port of entry. Data from the monitor are posted on the SDAPCD website and will be used to help address air pollution challenges in nearby communities. At the completion of the monitoring period, the EPA and SDAPCD will analyze the data and determine next steps. The closest PM 2.5 monitor is in Chula Vista, Calif., about 6 miles north of the port of entry, and does not provide data representative of PM 2.5 emissions at the Border.
“This air pollution monitor will allow us to track San Ysidro’s air quality and craft solutions to improve the air that local residents breathe,” said County Supervisor Greg Cox, who represents the area.
Binational environmental pollution is addressed through the Border 2020 Environment Program - a bi-national collaborative effort with a mission to protect human health and the environment along the U.S.–Mexico border.  To date, EPA has invested over $600 million in border environmental projects.   For more about EPA’s Border 2020 Program, please visit:www.epa.gov/border2020
PM 2.5 is one of the most pressing challenges to clean air today. When inhaled, this complex mixture of extremely small particles can reach the deepest regions of the lungs. Health studies have shown a significant association between exposure to fine particles and premature death from heart or lung disease. 
Air pollution presents a substantial environmental risk in some border communities that are frequently exposed to elevated concentrations of particulate matter PM10 and PM2.5, ozone, and toxic air pollutants. Communities that deal with multiple environmental stressors are often disadvantaged and more vulnerable to the impacts of air pollution. The border region includes a number of cities that share common airsheds; thus, activities in one city can directly affect the other, whether in the same country or across the border.
To access the AirNow website, please visit: http://sd.sdapcd.org/Airvision/
###

EPA's FY 2016 Budget Proposal Increases Support for Communities to Deliver Core Environmental and Health Protections

From EPA:


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
February 2, 2015
EPA's FY 2016 Budget Proposal Increases Support for Communities to Deliver Core Environmental and Health Protections

WASHINGTON – The Obama Administration Fiscal Year 2016 budget announced today for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) lays out a strategy to ensure that all Americans benefit from the economic recovery we are seeing today. The proposed EPA FY 2016 budget of $8.6 billion provides resources vital to that overarching vision and the request is $452 million above the agency’s enacted level for FY 2015.
“This budget sends a strong signal that the President is fully committed to making the investments needed to meet our mission to protect public health and the environment.  The funding allows us to further our important work to combat the impacts of climate change and deliver on the President’s Climate Action Plan while improving air quality, protecting our water, executing rigorous scientific research and ensuring the public safety from toxic chemicals,” said Stan Meiburg, EPA Acting Deputy Administrator.  “At the center of our work is collaborating with our state, local, and tribal partners and working with business, industry, and stakeholders to find commonsense solutions to complex environmental issues and work toward a sustainable future for all Americans through effective use of the public resources entrusted to us.”

Fiscal Year 2016 budget highlights include
:

Making a Visible Difference in Communities Across the Country
A key element of EPA’s FY 2016 efforts will be coordination with other federal agencies, states, tribes, and stakeholders. This coordination will help to focus the work of diverse programs across the agency at the community level. In response to feedback from across the country, this budget proposes a multifaceted effort to enable communities of all sizes, rural and urban, to find needed assistance and support for capacity building, planning, and implementation of environmental protection programs.
In addition to new cross-program efforts, including 20 full time equivalents for Community Resource Coordinators, $2 million for Circuit Riders, and $5 million to coordinate efforts at the local level in overburdened and vulnerable communities, the budget provides for targeted community efforts in each of the program areas.  These efforts, highlighted in more detail in the subsequent sections, will include helping communities adopt green infrastructure, providing technical assistance for building resilience and adapting to climate change, and helping communities to reduce environmental impacts through advanced monitoring technology and decision making tools.

Addressing Climate Change and Improving Air Quality
The FY 2016 budget prioritizes actions to reduce the impacts of climate change, one of the most significant challenges for this and future generations, and supports the President’s Climate Action Plan. EPA’s FY 2016 Budget includes $239 million for efforts to cut carbon pollution and other greenhouse gases through commonsense standards, guidelines, and voluntary programs. The EPA’s Clean Power Plan, which establishes carbon pollution reduction standards for existing power plants, is a top priority for the EPA and will help spur innovation and economic growth while creating a clean energy economy. Finalizing and implementing these regulations will involve innovative approaches and flexibility for achieving solutions, as well as extensive and unprecedented work with states, tribes, and territories, which is why this budget includes additional funding for states. In addition to EPA’s discretionary budget, the President also proposes a $4 billion Clean Power State Incentive Fund, a mandatory account to be administered by the EPA that supports state efforts to go above and beyond their carbon pollution reduction goals in the power sector.
Working with the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, the EPA will also develop Phase 2 greenhouse gas and fuel efficiency standards for heavy-duty vehicles. These standards will represent significant savings at the pump, reduce carbon pollution, and reduce fuel costs for businesses, which is anticipated to lower prices for consumers.

Protecting the Nation’s Waters
Protecting America’s water resources is critical to EPA’s mission, so the agency will continue to build upon decades of efforts to ensure our waterways are clean and our drinking water is safe because there are far reaching effects when rivers, lakes, and oceans becomes polluted. They can endanger wildlife, make our drinking water unsafe and threaten the waters where we swim and fish. Building on the strong funding level of $2.3 billion provided through the Clean Water and Drinking Water State Revolving Funds, $50 million is included for technical assistance, training, and other efforts to enhance the capacity of communities and states to plan and finance drinking water and wastewater infrastructure improvements. In January 2015, the agency launched a key component of this expanded effort, the Water Infrastructure and Resiliency Finance Center. It will help communities across the country focus on financial planning for future public infrastructure investments, expanding work with states to identify financing opportunities for rural communities, and enhancing partnership and collaboration with the U.S. Department of Agriculture on training, technical assistance, and funding opportunities in rural areas. The Water Infrastructure and Resilience Finance center is part of the Build America investment initiative, a government-wide effort to increase infrastructure investment and promote economic growth by creating opportunities for state and local governments and the private sector to collaborate on infrastructure development.

Taking Steps to Improve Chemical Facility Safety 
In support of the White House Executive Order to Improve Chemical Facility Safety and Security, the EPA is requesting $27.8 million for the State and Local Prevention and Preparedness program, an increase of $12 million above the FY 2015 enacted level. This increase will allow EPA to continue to improve the safety and security of chemical facilities and reduce the risks of hazardous chemicals to facility workers and operators, communities, and responders. These efforts represent a shared commitment among those with a stake in chemical facility safety and security: facility owners and operators; federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial governments; regional entities; nonprofit organizations; facility workers; first responders; environmental justice and local environmental organizations; and communities. In FY 2016, we are implementing actions to strengthen community planning and preparedness, enhance federal operational coordination, improve data management, modernize policies and regulation, and incorporate stakeholder feedback and best practices.

Protecting Our Land
EPA strives to protect and restore land to create a safer environment for all Americans by cleaning up hazardous and non-hazardous wastes that can migrate to air, groundwater and surface water, contaminating drinking water supplies, causing acute illnesses and chronic diseases, and threatening healthy ecosystems. We preserve, restore, and protect our land, for both current and future generations by cleaning up contaminated sites and returning them to communities for reuse. Our funds will assist communities in using existing infrastructure and planning for more efficient and livable communities, and encouraging the minimization of environmental impacts throughout the full life cycle of materials. In FY 2016, we will increase the Superfund Remedial program by $34 million to accelerate the pace of cleanups, supporting states, local communities, and tribes in their efforts to assess and cleanup sites and return them to productive reuse, and encourage renewable energy development on formerly hazardous sites when appropriate. We will expand the successful Brownfields program, providing grants, and supporting area-wide planning and technical assistance to maximize the benefits to the communities. In FY 2016, the EPA is investing $110 million in funding for Brownfields Project grants to local communities, an additional $30 million over the FY 2015 Enacted Budget, increasing the number of grants for assessment and cleanup of contaminated sites. This investment builds on the program’s successful community-driven approach to revitalizing contaminated land and further supports the Agency’s efforts to make a visible difference in communities.

Ensuring the Safety of Chemicals and Preventing Pollution
EPA’s chemical safety programs are at the forefront of its efforts to advance a sustainable future. In FY 2016, we are requesting $667.9 million, an increase of $47.4 million over the FY 2015 Enacted Budget, to develop new computational tools, and expand and enhance the quality, accessibility, and usefulness of information about commercial chemicals and pesticides, thereby strengthening the capability of the EPA, other regulators, and the public to assess chemical hazards and potential exposures, identify potential risks to human health and the environment and take appropriate risk management action. The EPA will work aggressively to ensure sound science, complete additional risk assessments from the TSCA Work Plan list of existing chemicals and meet its requirement to review all current pesticide registrations by 2022. In FY 2016, the EPA’s Office of Pesticide Programs will continue the important work initiated by the Presidential Memorandum to Promote the Health of Honey Bees and Other Pollinators to reverse pollinator losses and help restore populations to healthy levels. The EPA is committing $2 million towards this effort: $1.5 million to further the study of acute toxicity amongst honey bee populations and explore additional risk management options, and $500,000 to augment the work of States and Tribes to develop pollinator protection plans.

Continuing EPA’s Commitment to Innovative Research & Development
Environmental issues in the 21st century are complex because of the interplay between air quality, climate change, water quality, healthy communities, and chemical safety. They require different thinking and solutions than those used in the past. The EPA’s Office of Research and Development is strengthening the Agency’s ability to develop solutions by providing $528 million to evaluate and predict potential environmental and human health impacts for decision makers at all levels of government. Activities in the FY 2016 Budget include providing support tools for community health, investigating the unique properties of emerging materials, such as nanomaterials, and research to support the nation’s range of growing water-use and ecological requirements. 

Supporting State and Tribal Partners
Effective environmental protection is a joint effort of EPA, states and our tribal partners. In FY 2016, we are requesting an increase of $108 million in funding for State and Tribal Assistance categorical grants and setting a high bar for continuing our partnership efforts with states and tribes. We are also including opportunities for closer collaboration and targeted joint planning and governance processes. One example is the commitment to work collaboratively to streamline, reform, and integrate our shared business processes and related systems through the E-Enterprise approach. State-EPA-Tribal joint governance serves to organize the E-Enterprise partnership to elevate its visibility, boost coordination capacity, and ensure the inclusiveness and effectiveness of shared process and management improvements. This will yield the benefits of increased transparency, efficiency, and burden reduction for communities, businesses, and government agencies when implemented. 

Maintaining a Forward Looking and Adaptive EPA
The EPA has strategically evaluated its workforce and facility needs and will continue the comprehensive effort to optimize and update its physical footprint. In 2016, we will fast-track our efforts to save taxpayer dollars through space optimization and essential renovations, including the important laboratory buildings across the country, without sacrificing high quality of research. The agency will continue to improve our processes and the business enterprise of environmental protection for regulated companies and the public through the joint E-Enterprise effort with states to leverage technology and streamline workflow, data quality, data sharing and transparency.

Reducing and Eliminating ProgramsThe EPA continues to examine its programs to find those that have served their purpose and accomplished their mission. The FY 2016 President’s Budget also eliminates a number of programs totaling $44 million. Details are found in the EPA FY 2016 Congressional Justification. http://www2.epa.gov/planandbudget/fy2016).

For more information on the EPA’s FY 2016 proposed budget, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/planandbudget/fy2016.

R033

EPA leads effort to contain jet fuel spill on Sand Island

From EPA:


For Immediate Release: January 30, 2015
Media Contact:  Dean Higuchi, 808-541-2711, higuchi.dean@epa.gov                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
EPA leads effort to contain jet fuel spill on Sand Island
Federal cleanup order issued to facility’s owner and operator

HONOLULU – Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued a federal Clean Water Act order to ensure the continued cleanup of spilled jet fuel at a tank farm facility on the Sand Island Access Road in Honolulu.

The order requires Airport Service Group International (ASIG), the facility operator, and Hawaii Fueling Facilities Corp., the facility owner, to proceed with cleanup work that will prevent fuel from entering waters or shoreline areas.

Since the 42,000 gallon spill was reported on Jan. 21, the cleanup efforts overseen by EPA, along with Hawaii State Department of Health (DOH), has resulted in the recovery of over 16,000 gallons of spilled jet fuel at the ASIG facility, which provides airplane fuel at the Honolulu International Airport. DOH reports the release does not pose a risk to drinking water. However, fuel has been found to have migrated offsite from the facility through subsurface contamination and is within 150 feet of the harbor.

“Our action today is to make sure the fuel is cleaned up quickly to protect public health and Oahu’s ocean environment,” said Jared Blumenfeld, EPA’s Regional Administrator for the Pacific Southwest. “We will be monitoring the work closely, and will investigate the cause of the spill to prevent one from happening again.”

The ongoing recovery effort includes pumping fuel from extraction trenches and tank monitoring wells. EPA emergency response contractors are also conducting air monitoring. Today’s compliance order, which does not include potential penalties, requires the facility owner and operator to:

  • Submit to EPA by Feb. 5 a work plan for daily response activities,
  • Clean up all petroleum or contaminated materials released to the environment as a result of the spill,
  • Prevent further releases and impacts to the environment resulting from releases of oil/fuel to waters and adjoining shorelines,
  • Repair all damaged equipment at the facility to prevent future spills of petroleum
  • Submit a plan by Mar. 2 for confirmatory sampling to ensure that the cleanup activities are complete.

The ASIG reported to DOH that the spill was the result of a leak in the bottom of ASIG’s Tank #2. The above ground storage tank has a 2.8 million gallon capacity. The ASIG facility has 16 above ground tanks with a total facility capacity of 44.8 million gallons of fuel and supplies fuel to the Honolulu International Airport.

EPA is leading the response effort with an On-Scene Coordinator and contractors dispatched from the agency’s Pacific Southwest Regional Office in San Francisco. They are working closely with the DOH’s Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response branch staff and the ASIG facility staff.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   ###

EPA to Update Community on Toms River, NJ Superfund Site

From EPA:


EPA to Update Community on Toms River, NJ Superfund Site

EPA and National Toxicology Program scientists to Discuss Study of SAN Trimer

Contact: Elias Rodriguez, (212) 637-3664, rodriguez.elias@epa.gov



(New York, N.Y. – Jan. 30, 2015) On February 4, 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will hold a public meeting to discuss how a new scientific study about a previously unknown contaminant relates to the ongoing cleanup at the Reich Farm Superfund site in Toms River formerly Dover, Ocean County, NJ. The EPA will be joined by scientists from the National Toxicology Program to discuss the study. EPA does not plan to make any changes to the groundwater treatment system currently operating at the site, but does intend to make adjustments to the cleanup goals based on the new information. The meeting will take place on Wednesday, February 4, 2015 at 6:00 pm at the Ocean County Library Toms River Branch, 101 Washington Street, Toms River, NJ.



In 1971, a waste hauler working for Union Carbide improperly disposed of drums containing toxic solvents on a portion of the three acre Reich Farm property in Dover, New Jersey. As a result, soil and groundwater on the Reich Farm property were contaminated with volatile organic compounds, or VOCs, including two widely used solvents, PCE and TCE. Exposure to PCE and TCE can have serious health impacts, including liver damage and increased risk of cancer.



The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) took a number of actions through the 1970s to address the site, including requiring Union Carbide to remove more than 4,500 drums and some contaminated soil from the site. NJDEP also found PCE and TCE in some drinking water wells adjacent to the site. These wells were closed.



The EPA added the site to its Superfund list in 1983 after EPA investigations determined the extent of the PCE and TCE contamination in the soil and groundwater. The EPA developed a cleanup plan in 1988 for the site that included treating contaminated soils, as well as pumping and treating contaminated groundwater. In 1995 EPA modified the cleanup plan to allow the continued treatment of groundwater through an existing system at the Parkway well field. The soil cleanup was completed in 1995 and the groundwater cleanup is ongoing.



In 1996, a statistically significant elevation in the rates of certain childhood cancers was found in the Toms River area. In response to this finding, New Jersey's Department of Health and Senior Services, in cooperation with the U.S. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, studied the potential causes of the elevated cancer rates. During that effort they found previously unknown and unregulated semi-volatile contaminants in the groundwater. The contaminants were later identified as styrene-acrylonitrile trimer, now referred to collectively as the SAN Trimer.



While the EPA did not have scientific information about these contaminants, it did determine that the system originally installed to remove the VOCs would not be effective in removing the SAN Trimer. The EPA enhanced its original cleanup plan to require that a new form of treatment be installed, which used activated carbon to effectively remove semi-volatile chemicals. This enhanced system has been operating since 1997.



The National Toxicology Program is an interagency program headquartered at the National Institute of

Environmental Health Sciences, part of the National Institutes of Health. The National Toxicology Program was asked to conduct studies on SAN Trimer to determine health effects, including whether SAN Trimer causes cancer in rats. The NTP studies were completed and peer reviewed by scientific experts before being published in 2012. The NTP found that SAN Trimer did not cause cancer in male and female rats, but did report it caused some non cancer potential health effects such as nerve damage.



Based on this new health information, EPA’s Office of Research and Development developed exposure levels based on risk for the chemical, and toxicology experts within EPA subsequently have developed new clean up levels for groundwater and soil at the Reich Farm site.



The EPA had set its goal for Reich Farm as “no detectable levels” of the chemical. The Agency now has more definitive numbers based on potential risk to people’s health. Based on the scientific information, the EPA intends to establish the new cleanup goals for soil at 185 parts per million and for groundwater at 60 parts per billion. The new cleanup numbers are based on conservative assumptions, such as an adult drinking 2.5 liters of the groundwater every day for 20 years. Levels of the SAN Trimer in the soil and groundwater are currently below the new levels that EPA is proposing to set. The EPA is proposing to make these soil and groundwater cleanup levels, developed specifically for the Reich Farm Superfund site, part of the legally mandated cleanup requirements for the site.



The system currently treating groundwater at the site reduces the levels of SAN Trimer to levels not detectable by lab equipment. The EPA intends to continue to require this system until all cleanup goals for contaminants are met for the site. Groundwater contaminated with the SAN Trimer is not being consumed. Instead, it is being treated and discharged to the ground surface.



The EPA’s public meeting on February 4, 2015 will include scientific experts who conducted the SAN Trimer study, and will join EPA to explain the latest information and discuss how it may impact the cleanup of the site in the future.



To learn more about the Reich Farm Superfund site or to view the San Trimer, please visit:




To view the NTP report, please visit: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/htdocs/lt_rpts/tr573_508.pdf



Follow EPA Region 2 on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/eparegion2 and visit our Facebook page, http://www.facebook.com/eparegion2



15-004

EPA Highlights Green Sports Initiatives at Killington Resort

From EPA:


News Release
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
New England Regional Office
January 30, 2015
Contact: Emily Bender, 617-918-1037
EPA Highlights Green Sports Initiatives at Killington Resort
KILLINGTON, VT – This week EPA is focused on how to reduce environmental impacts of our favorite sports.  EPA toured the Killington Resort to highlight green operations that got Killington named Vermont’s Overall Greenest Resort in 2014 by Ski Vermont, and EPA highlights Killington’s green operations.
Last year, was the hottest year on record, and each of the last three decades has been hotter than the last.  In mountain towns that depend on winter tourism, the realities of climate change really impact local economies. Shorter, warmer winters mean a shorter season to enjoy the winter sports we love—and a financial hit for local economies that depend on winter sports. Skiing, snowboarding and other types of winter recreation add $67 billion to the economy every year, and they support 900,000 jobs.
The Killington Resort has been investing in green operations to reduce its environmental impact over the last few years.  Killington powers its K1 Gondola and the Peak Restaurant with purchases of electricity generated by BioGas, commonly known as Cow Power.  Killington purchases over a million kiloWatthours of energy through Green Mountain Power’s Cow Power program.  That energy is equivalent to nearly 170 homes total electricity usage.  The Cow Power program is supported by 13 dairy farms with a total of nearly 13,000 cows contributing to this renewable energy source in Vermont.  Cow Power replaces energy generated elsewhere in Vermont and New England, plus has the added benefit of reduced greenhouse gas emissions.
“It is great to see one of New England’s biggest ski resorts invest in green and energy efficient operations,” said Curt Spalding, regional administrator of EPA's New England office.  “Climate Change is a challenge for the winter sports industry, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions and energy footprint at big operations like Killington are a big step in the right direction.”
 
Some of the other green operations featured at Killington include:
•    Killington has invested in 400 energy efficient snow guns in the past year.
•    Greywater in bathrooms on the mountain.  Greywater is nearly potable water that can be recycled onsite for toilet flushing.  Greywater is a more efficient use of water.
•    Electric car charging stations at the Killington Grand Resort Hotel
"We are thrilled to host Mr. Spalding and greatly appreciate the recognition of our sustainability efforts. We strive to improve the efficiency of our resort operations each year and I'm proud of the steps we have taken to this point,” said Michael Solimano, President and General Manager at Killington Resort & Pico Mountain.
”Killington’s investment in Cow Power makes a direct investment in renewable generation on a Vermont dairy farm, which produce greenhouse gas reductions from manure storage, reduce odors at the farm, and the process can help farms reduce nutrient runoff,” said David Dunn of Green Mountain Power.  
More information on EPA’s Green Sports initiative: http://www2.epa.gov/green-sports 
#  #  #

Desertification

From the National Science Foundation:




Desertification -- when #drylands become increasingly drier and more desolate, losing water and life -- is an increasing threat worldwide. New #NSFfunded research reveals that this process is a complex transition, with roots in historical ecological events. The research can help inform land-management decisions. Learn more:http://1.usa.gov/1KnJyxQ

Photo credit: NSF Jornada Basin LTER-USDA/ARS

Tuesday, February 3, 2015

Eelgrass Project off Bainbridge Island

From U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Headquarters:




This photo shows work being done on an eelgrass project off Bainbridge Island. The project restores nursery habitat for juvenile salmonids through the restoration of eelgrass beds. More than 40,000 tons of clean pea gravel and sand will be placed in an offshore depression to provide substrate for the eelgrass at the proper water depth. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is the project sponsor. The fill placement started on Jan. 8, 2015, and pea gravel placement was completed on Jan. 23. Sand placement to began last week. The in-water work must be complete by Feb. 15 and we are on track to meet that deadline.